Argued

No. 16-402

Timothy Ivory Carpenter v. United States

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

See other cases from the Sixth Circuit.

Docket Entries

Argued. For petitioner: Nathan F. Wessler, New York, N. Y. For respondent: Michael R. Dreeben, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.

Reply of petitioner Timothy I. Carpenter filed. (Distributed)

Record received from the U.S.C.A. 6th Circuit is electronic.

Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 6th Circuit.

CIRCULATED

SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Wednesday, November 29, 2017

Motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis granted by the Court

Brief amicus curiae of National District Attorneys Association filed.

Brief amici curiae of Alabama, et al. filed.

Motion to appoint counsel filed by petitioner GRANTED and Harold Gurewitz, Esquire, of Detroit, Michigan, is appointed to serve as counsel for the petitioner in this case.

Brief amicus curiae of Professor Orin S. Kerr filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Michael Varco filed.

Brief of respondent United States filed.

Brief amici curiae of Empirical Fourth Amendment Scholars filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Center for Democracy and Technology filed.

Brief amici curiae of Technology Experts filed.

Brief amici curiae of United States Justice Foundation, et al. filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Restore the Fourth, Inc. filed.

Brief amici curiae of Institute for Justice, et al. filed.

Brief amici curiae of Electronic Frontier Foundation, et al. filed.

Brief amici curiae of Scholars of Criminal Procedure and Privacy filed.

Brief amici curiae of Technology Companies in support of neither party filed.

Brief amici curiae of The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, et al. filed.

Brief amici curiae of Scholars of the History and Original Meaning of the Fourth Amendment filed.

Brief amici curiae of The Center for Competitive Politics, et al. filed.

Brief amicus curiae of The Rutherford Institute filed.

Brief amici curiae of Electronic Privacy Information Center, et al. filed.

Brief amici curiae of Data & Society Research Institute and Fifteen scholars of Technology and Society filed.

Brief amici curiae of Competitive Enterprise Institute, et al. filed.

Brief of petitioner Timothy I. Carpenter filed.

Joint appendix filed.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/25/2017.

Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs in support of either or neither party received from counsel for the respondent.

Motion to appoint counsel filed by petitioner Timothy I. Carpenter.

Motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis filed by petitioner Timothy I. Carpenter.

Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs in support of either party or neither party received from counsel for the petitioner.

The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including September 25, 2017.

The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 7, 2017.

Petition GRANTED.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 1, 2017.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 25, 2017.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 18, 2017.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 11, 2017.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 28, 2017.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 21, 2017.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 13, 2017.

Rescheduled.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 3, 2017.

Reply of petitioner Timothy Ivory Carpenter filed.

Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.

Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including January 27, 2016.

Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including December 28, 2016.

Brief amicus curiae of Cato Institute filed.

Brief amici curiae of Electronic Frontier Foundation, et al. filed.

Order extending time to file response to petition to and including November 28, 2016.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 28, 2016)

Parties

Timothy I. Carpenter, Petitioner, represented by Harold Gurewitz

Timothy Ivory Carpenter, Petitioner, represented by Nathan F. Wessler

Amici Curiae

Cato Institute, Amicus Curiae, represented by James W. Harper

Center for Democracy & Technology, Amicus Curiae, represented by Andrew John Pincus

Competitive Enterprise Institute, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by James W. Harper

Data & Society Research Institute and fifteen scholars of technology and society, Amicus Curiae, represented by Andrew David Selbst

Electronic Frontier Foundation, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Jennifer Lynch

Electronic Frontier Foundation, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Andrew Gellis Crocker

Electronic Privacy Information Center, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Marc Rotenberg

Empirical Fourth Amendment Scholars, Amicus Curiae, represented by Sarah O'Rourke Schrup

Institute for Justice, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Wesley Patrick Hottot

Michael Varco, Amicus Curiae, represented by Michael Anthony Varco

National District Attorneys Association, Amicus Curiae, represented by John M. Castellano

Professor Orin S. Kerr, Amicus Curiae, represented by Orin S. Kerr

Restore the Fourth, Inc., Amicus Curiae, represented by Mahesha Padmanabhan Subbaraman

Scholars of Criminal Procedure and Privacy, Amicus Curiae, represented by Harry Sandick

Scholars of History and Original Meaning of the Fourth Amendment, Amicus Curiae, represented by Gorod Brianne

Technology Experts, Amicus Curiae, represented by Alexander Abraham Abdo

The Center for Competitive Politics, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Allen Joseph Dickerson

The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Bruce D. Brown

The Rutherford Institute, Amicus Curiae, represented by Dorothy Alicia Hickok

The States of Alabama, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Amitabh Agarwal

United States Justice Foundation, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Robert Jeffrey Olson

 
Last updated: December 14, 2017